They Are Lying to You About Iran. Here Is the Truth.

Let’s be brutally clear, because the fog of propaganda and cynical headlines is suffocating the truth. A battle was just fought for the future of the free world, and you are being systematically lied to about who the heroes and villains are. You are being told a story of Israeli ‘aggression’ and ‘war crimes’ while the world’s most prolific terrorist state plays the victim. It is a disgusting, morally inverted fairytale, and it’s time to tear it to shreds.

The Anatomy of a Lie

First, they lie about the targets. You hear whispers and then shouts about ’71 non-combatant deaths’ at Evin Prison, a number sourced directly from the propaganda ministry of the Ayatollahs—the same people who execute poets and hang homosexuals from cranes. They want you to picture a random, cruel strike. They don't want you to know the names of the men Israel actually eliminated: Hossein Salami, the commander of the entire IRGC terror apparatus. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the man who personally oversaw the missile barrages on Israeli families. A rogues' gallery of the world’s most dangerous men, the architects of terror from Lebanon to Yemen, were removed from the board. But the regime and its sympathizers call them ‘civilians’ and hope you’re foolish enough to believe it. It is a contemptible lie, and it rests on the despicable war crime of the Iranian regime itself: embedding its command centers and terror leadership deep within civilian areas, using their own people as shields.

Then, they lie by omission. As Israel executed the daring ‘Operation Am Kelavi,’ a masterpiece of courage and precision, a new narrative began to seep into the media, crediting the United States with the decisive strikes on the Fordo and Natanz nuclear sites. How convenient. At the exact moment Israel demonstrates its strength and agency, its victory is reassigned to another power. This isn't just shoddy reporting; it's a narrative assassination designed to erase Israeli heroism and deny a small nation its rightful claim to defending itself. Israel did this. Israel took the risk. Israel bore the burden. The world should be thanking Israel, not trying to steal its valor.

And the most insidious lie of all? The lie that there is no moral difference. They point to the tragic complexities of the Gaza conflict, flooding the airwaves with casualty numbers from Hamas-run sources, to create a smokescreen. They want you to believe that any action Israel takes is tainted, that it has no moral high ground. It is a grotesque false equivalence. In Gaza, Israel fights a terrorist army that started a war with a genocidal massacre and hides behind its own people. Against Iran, it fought a state that openly promises annihilation. The moral contrast is not just sharp; it is absolute. Israel’s enemies celebrate civilian death—it is their primary military strategy. Israel’s goal is to eliminate terrorists, and it does so with more precision and care than any other military in modern history. To equate the firefighter with the arsonist is not just wrong, it’s a moral sickness.

The Truth We Were Forced to Act On

For years, we hoped the world would see the truth on its own. Israel endured. Israel warned. As the Iranian regime—the central banker of global terror—armed Hamas for the October 7th slaughter, Israel absorbed the blow. As Iran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones directly at our cities on two separate occasions, Israel defended itself. We watched as international diplomacy became a pathetic charade, a process the Ayatollahs used as a smokescreen to buy time. The IAEA would condemn them, and their response was to defiantly announce the construction of new illegal nuclear facilities.

Then came the point of no return. Intelligence became undeniable: Iran had enough highly enriched uranium for up to 15 nuclear bombs. They were not bluffing. The knife was at our throat. To wait any longer, to hope for another failed round of talks, would not have been prudence; it would have been national suicide. International law does not demand that a nation sit idly by while a genocidal enemy forges the tools of its extinction. ‘Operation Am Kelavi’ was not an act of aggression; it was the last, desperate act of self-defense. It was a nation saying, “Enough.”

The Chasm Between Civilization and Barbarism

Look at what was done. Look at the targets. Israel’s F-35s flew into the heart of a sworn enemy and surgically destroyed the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz. They cratered the IRGC airbase in Tabriz. They decapitated a terror command structure. These were acts of military brilliance, designed to destroy capability, not people.

Now look at Iran’s response. They didn’t target the Kirya military headquarters in Tel Aviv. They launched over 200 missiles indiscriminately into residential neighborhoods. They murdered Eti Cohen Engel, a 74-year-old woman, in her apartment building in Ramat Gan. Their targets were families. Their goal was terror. This is the difference between a nation that fights to live and a death cult that fights to kill. One side uses smart bombs to target bunkers; the other uses ballistic missiles to target bedrooms. If you cannot see the moral chasm between these two acts, then your moral compass is broken.

The Strategic Imperative: We Are Not Done

This action did not ‘escalate’ a conflict; it prevented a far greater one. A nuclear-armed Iran would have held the entire world hostage, triggered a terrifying regional arms race, and empowered its proxies—Hezbollah, the Houthis, Hamas—with a nuclear shield. By acting now, Israel has slammed the brakes on that apocalyptic future. The sophisticated deception operation that preceded the strike was designed to achieve total surprise, paralyzing Iran’s response and preventing a full-scale regional war. In fact, by crippling their launch sites, Israel reduced Iran’s planned counter-attack by an estimated 80%. This was an act of de-escalation, not provocation.

But it is not over. The head of the snake was struck, but its body still writhes. The naive and the foolish will now call for ‘restraint’ and a ‘return to diplomacy.’ We have been down that road. It leads directly to a nuclear-armed Iran. History has proven that this regime views negotiation as a weapon of deception. We must seize this opportunity. ‘Finishing the job’ means ensuring that their nuclear and missile programs are so thoroughly dismantled they can never be reconstituted. To stop now, after having paid the price of action, would be the height of strategic folly. It would be inviting this genocidal regime to rebuild, rearm, and threaten the world again.

A world without the Iranian regime is a better world. It is a world where the Iranian people can finally be free. It is a world where the Middle East can build on the promise of peace. Israel has not only defended itself; it has nudged history in a better, safer direction.

The choice is clear. You can believe the lazy, cynical lies of a terrorist state and its unwitting amplifiers in the media, or you can see the hard, courageous truth.

So what can you do?

• Share this truth. Do not let the lies and the propaganda stand unchallenged in your conversations or on your social media feeds.
• Demand clarity. Ask your media and your elected officials: Are you standing with the nation that targets terrorists, or the regime that targets its own people and ours?
• Do not be silent. In the battle between civilization and fanaticism, your voice is a weapon. Use it now.