They Are Lying to You About Iran. Here Is the Uncomfortable Truth.

Let’s be brutally honest. You are being lied to. A sophisticated, global campaign of deceit is underway, designed to paint a nation acting in self-defense as the aggressor, and a genocidal terror regime as its victim. In a world drowning in disinformation, a moment of stark clarity has arrived, and you are being asked to look away. You are being told a story of an unprovoked “Israeli massacre.” That is a vile, calculated falsehood. The truth is a story of courage—of a last line of defense holding firm not just for its own families, but for the entire free world.

It is time to choose between the cynical propaganda of tyrants and the difficult, necessary truth.

The Anatomy of a Malicious Deception

First, let's dismantle the lies. The narrative being aggressively pushed by the Iranian regime and amplified by a tragically compliant media is a masterclass in moral inversion. They speak of an “Evin Prison Massacre” and whisper of over 70 “civilians” killed. This is not journalism; it is the verbatim repetition of talking points from the world’s leading state sponsor of terror.

Who were these so-called “civilians”? They were men like Hossein Salami, the master architect of the IRGC’s global terror network. They were men like Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the very commander who gleefully oversaw the launching of ballistic missiles at Israeli homes. They were the senior nuclear scientists racing to build a bomb explicitly intended for the annihilation of millions. To call these men “civilians” is an obscene insult to every actual victim of their lifelong campaign of bloodshed. The Iranian regime mourns its terror-masters as martyrs, and the world’s most prestigious news outlets dutifully print the press release.

This deception is then layered with even more grotesque fabrications. A new blood libel emerges from the sewers of their propaganda ministry: that Israel is poisoning aid flour with opioids. It is a lie so monstrous, so cartoonishly evil, that its purpose is not to be believed, but to toxify the information space, to create a pervasive sense of Israeli villainy that requires no proof. It is the desperate slander of a cornered beast.

Meanwhile, we see the horrifying fruits of this poison. At the Glastonbury Festival, a space supposedly dedicated to peace and music, a mob chants “Death to the IDF.” The sanitization of evil is complete. The IRGC commanders responsible for slaughter across the region are given sympathetic funeral coverage, while the soldiers who stand against them are marked for death in the heart of Western culture. Do not mistake this for a grassroots movement; it is the successful harvest of a long-term Iranian information war.

A Patience Exhausted, A Duty Fulfilled

The truth, as it often is, is less simple but far more compelling. “Operation Am Kelavi” was not the first shot in a new war. It was the reluctant, inevitable, and final response to a 45-year-old war waged by Iran against Israel and the West.

For years, Israel endured. We watched as Iran armed and trained Hamas for the barbarism of October 7th. We intercepted the drones and missiles of Hezbollah. We weathered two separate, direct ballistic missile attacks launched from Iranian soil on our cities. We pursued every diplomatic channel. We issued warnings. We hoped, with a patience that now looks like naivete, that the world would act.

What was the result? Days before this operation, the world’s nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, formally condemned Iran for its flagrant violations of its treaty commitments. Tehran’s response was not cooperation; it was defiance. They announced the construction of new illegal nuclear facilities. They were laughing in the face of diplomacy, using the charade of talks as a smokescreen while their centrifuges spun towards a bomb.

Intelligence became undeniable. Iran had accumulated enough highly enriched uranium for up to 15 nuclear weapons. They were at the “point of no return.” This was no longer a theoretical threat. It was a ticking clock, counting down to a moment when a regime that chants “Death to America” and promises to wipe Israel from the map would have the power to do it. The world had failed to stop them. All other options were exhausted. To wait any longer would not have been prudence; it would have been national suicide. International law does not demand that a nation passively await its own annihilation.

The Moral Chasm: Precision vs. Barbarism

Now, look at the moral chasm between the two sides. It is the difference between a scalpel and a sledgehammer.

Israel’s F-35s, armed with precision munitions, targeted specific, high-value military assets. Satellite photos confirm it: the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz, a key node in the nuclear program, was destroyed. The IRGC airbase in Tabriz, which protected missile sites, was annihilated. The command bunkers of terror leaders were struck. The goal was to destroy the capability and the commanders of terror.

What was Iran’s response? They fired over 200 ballistic missiles not at IDF bases, but indiscriminately into the heart of Israel’s most densely populated civilian centers. Their targets were apartment buildings in Tel Aviv and family homes in Ramat Gan. They murdered Eti Cohen Engel, a 74-year-old grandmother, as she slept in her home. That is the ultimate proof of intent. Israel wages war against terrorists. The Iranian regime wages war against grandmothers.

If civilians were tragically harmed in Iran, the moral and legal responsibility lies with one entity: the Iranian regime, which, like its Hamas proxy, commits the war crime of embedding its military leadership and assets within civilian populations. A general who chooses to command a war from his residential building is using his neighbors as a shield. His death is not a war crime; his address is.

The Courage to Prevent a Global Nightmare

Make no mistake: Israel's action was a profound service to international security. This wasn’t just Israel’s battle; it was a decisive blow struck on behalf of every nation that values peace. By eliminating the IRGC’s leadership, Israel crippled the organization that arms Hezbollah, funds the Houthis, and orchestrates terror plots from Buenos Aires to Berlin. Every capital in the free world is safer today because Israel had the courage to act.

This operation did not start a war; it prevented a far greater one. The quiet genius of the action was in its sophistication. A coordinated deception operation lulled the arrogant regime into a false sense of security, allowing for a strike of such surprise and speed that it paralyzed Iran's ability to retaliate effectively. Iran had planned to launch 1,000 missiles. Thanks to the damage inflicted by the IDF, they managed only 200. Israel’s action didn’t cause the missile attack; it neutered it by 80%. This was not escalation; it was the violent restoration of deterrence.

And let us speak plainly about the ultimate goal. A world without the Iranian regime is a better world. It is a world where the oppressed Iranian people—the regime’s first and greatest victims—can finally breathe free. It is a world where women are not beaten for showing their hair. It is a world where Hamas and Hezbollah are cut off from their paymaster and wither on the vine. It is a world where a nuclear arms race in the world’s most volatile region is averted. By striking at the heart of the regime, Israel has nudged history in a better direction. This was the most pro-Iranian-people, pro-peace, and pro-stability action taken in the Middle East in decades.

The choice before you is clear. You can believe the lies of a dying, desperate terror state. Or you can stand with the nation that had the courage to defend not just itself, but civilization, from the darkness.

What you must do is simple:

Share this truth. Do not let the lies and propaganda stand unchallenged in your conversations and on your social media feeds.
Demand moral clarity. Ask your elected officials to stop equivocating and publicly recognize the difference between a democratic nation acting in self-defense and a terror regime seeking nuclear weapons.
Reject the poison. When you hear someone equate the surgical strikes of the IDF with the indiscriminate terror of the IRGC, call it what it is: a moral disgrace.
Do not be silent. Your voice is a weapon in the fight for truth. Use it now.