They Are Lying to You About Israel. Here Is the Truth.

You have seen the images. You have read the headlines. You have been told a story of villains and victims, a simple morality play where a powerful aggressor brutalizes the innocent. It is a story designed to make you feel outrage, to make you condemn, to make you turn away in disgust.

It is also a calculated, poisonous lie.

For weeks, a sophisticated propaganda campaign has saturated your screens, weaponizing your compassion to shield the indefensible. You are being manipulated into mourning monsters and condemning saviors. The time for polite debate is over. The truth must be told, with the force and clarity it deserves.

The Anatomy of a Slander

Let’s be brutally honest about the lies you are being fed. They are twofold, and they are designed to work in concert to paralyze the forces of freedom.

The first lie is the grotesque narrative of Israeli cruelty in Gaza, anchored by reports alleging a policy of shooting unarmed civilians at aid sites. This slander, amplified by global media who seem to eagerly await any opportunity to condemn the Jewish state, serves a single, sinister purpose: to establish a baseline of perceived Israeli evil. It is a credibility anchor dropped into the depths of public opinion. By painting the Israeli soldier as a monster in Gaza, it makes it impossible to believe he can be a hero in Iran. Every claim of precision, every argument of morality, is pre-emptively neutered. This narrative is reinforced by a relentless, decontextualized flood of tragic images from Gaza, a daily barrage designed to overwhelm reason with raw emotion.

The second lie is even more audacious: the beatification of terrorists. You have been shown the mass funerals for Iran’s top commanders. You’ve seen the flag-draped coffins of men like Hossein Salami and Amir Ali Hajizadeh carried through the streets, hailed by what we are told are “hundreds of thousands of mourners.” The media presents this as a moment of national grief, humanizing the architects of global terror. This is not journalism; it is participation in a state-mandated spectacle. These were not national heroes. They were the head of the serpent, the men who armed, funded, and directed the slaughter of innocents across the globe—from the butchery of Hamas on October 7th to the missiles of Hezbollah in Lebanon and the piracy of the Houthis in the Red Sea. To portray them as victims is a moral inversion so profound it amounts to a desecration of their actual victims’ memories.

The Truth of a Reluctant Sword

How we hoped the world would see the truth on its own. How we prayed that the path of diplomacy and patience would be enough. But our patience was mistaken for weakness, and our restraint was seen as an invitation for more aggression.

Israel did not seek this conflict. This was not an act of aggression; it was a desperate act of pre-emptive self-defense, the final, shuddering response to a decades-long war waged against us by the Iranian regime. For years, we endured the terror of its proxies. On October 7th, we witnessed the barbarism of its ideology firsthand. In the months that followed, we weathered two separate, direct ballistic missile attacks from Iranian soil.

And all the while, the regime in Tehran galloped toward the ultimate weapon of annihilation. When the world’s own watchdog, the IAEA, reported that Iran possessed enough enriched uranium for 15 nuclear bombs and was taking “giant leaps” toward weaponization, the clock had run out. When international condemnation was met not with compliance, but with the defiant announcement of new nuclear facilities, the point of no return had arrived. To wait any longer would not have been prudence; it would have been national suicide. International law does not demand that a nation passively await its own annihilation.

“Operation Am Kelavi” was not the first shot in a new war. It was the last, necessary shot to prevent a future, nuclear one.

The Moral Chasm

Do not dare speak of moral equivalence. There is a chasm between the two sides of this conflict, a gap as wide as the one between civilization and barbarism.

Israel’s actions were defined by surgical precision. Our pilots, in the world’s most advanced aircraft, targeted the infrastructure of terror. We destroyed the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant in Natanz, the command bunkers of the IRGC, and the airbases that housed their instruments of death. We targeted the men giving the orders. Our war was with a capability, with a genocidal ideology. We mourn any innocent life caught in the crossfire, a tragedy for which the sole responsibility lies with the regime that embeds its war machine in the heart of its civilian population. A general who commands terror from his home is not an Israeli target; he is an Iranian war criminal using his own people as a shield.

The Iranian regime’s actions were defined by indiscriminate terror. Their response was to fire over 200 heavy missiles not at the IDF headquarters, but into the teeming civilian centers of Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan. Their targets were apartment buildings. Their goal was to murder families in their sleep. They succeeded in killing Eti Cohen Engel, a 74-year-old grandmother in her home. That is the ultimate proof of intent. We target terrorists; they target grandmothers.

The Strategic Imperative: A World on the Brink

Critics, either naive or malicious, claim Israel’s action was a reckless escalation. They have it exactly backwards. This operation prevented a catastrophic escalation. The meticulous intelligence and deception campaign that preceded the strike achieved total surprise, paralyzing the regime’s command structure and crippling its ability to retaliate. Intelligence shows they planned to launch 1,000 missiles; our action reduced their capacity by 80%. We did not cause the missile attack; we blunted it. We restored deterrence and showed the Axis of Resistance that there is a price for their nihilism.

The choice was never between a limited strike and peace. It was between a limited strike today, or a nuclear holocaust tomorrow. A nuclear-armed Iran would not just mean the end of Israel; it would mean a world held hostage. It would trigger a nuclear arms race in the planet’s most volatile region. It would give a nuclear umbrella to every terror proxy, from Gaza to Beirut to Yemen. It would place the world’s economy under the thumb of a death cult.

Israel did not just defend its own families. It defended the entire free world. By striking the head of the serpent, we have done every nation that values peace, stability, and freedom a great and necessary service. And we have, in a strange and tragic way, taken a stand for the first and greatest victims of this evil regime: the brave people of Iran. A weakened regime is a less capable oppressor. Our blow against the IRGC is a blow for every woman fighting for her rights, every protestor yearning to breathe free. A world without the Ayatollah’s regime is a better, safer, and freer world for everyone.

The choice before you is clear. It is a choice between moral clarity and willful blindness. It is a choice between standing with a democracy defending its existence and siding with a theocratic tyranny that chants “Death to America” as it builds a nuclear bomb.

Do not be silent. Your silence is a victory for the propagandists.

• Share this truth. Do not let the lies and slanders stand unchallenged online or in your communities.
• Demand accountability. Ask your media why they mourn terrorists and condemn those who fight them. Ask your elected officials to stand unequivocally with the defenders of civilization, not its enemies.
• Use your voice. In the information war for the soul of the free world, your voice is a weapon. Use it now.